Georgia sex offender registry: Over 16,000 stories for each crime
Georgia sex offender registry: Over 16,000 stories for each crime Save Email Print
Posted: 10:04 AM Nov 19, 2008
Last Updated: 11:19 AM Nov 19, 2008
Reporter: Katie Beasley
Email Address: Katie.Beasley@wrdw.com

A | A | A

News 12 First at Five, November 18, 2008

AUGUSTA, Ga.---Wendy Whitaker, she's the Harlem women arrested and charged with having consensual sex. Wendy was forced to register as a sex offender, even though not all sex offenders can be put into the same category. Wendy is one of over 16,000 people on Georgia's sex offender registry. One of over 16,000 stories to go along with each crime.

This is Wendy Whitaker -- she's one of thousands on the Georgia sex offender registry. Wendy had consensual oral sex with a classmate. She was seventeen, he was fifteen. That crime, from twelve years ago, has her being forced to move from her Harlem home because of Georgia's residency restrictions.

Richmond County Investigator Ron Sylvester says that's the way the law works. "Without there being a court order or something removing them from the registry then they're on it for life," says Sylvester.

This is Jeffery York -- he's on the registry because of a similar situation. Like Wendy, Jeffery was also charged with sodomy for having oral sex with a classmate. He was also seventeen, his classmate was fifteen. Another similarity between Wendy and Jeffery is that if they had committed their crime today, they wouldn't be on this list.

"Under those changes there are people who are on the registry now that if they were charged after 2006 would not have been on the registry," explains Investigator Sylvester.

This is Genarlow Wilson -- in 2003 he also had consensual oral sex with a classmate, the whole thing captured on tape at a New Years Eve party. Again, Genarlow was seventeen, the girl only fifteen. He was charged with aggravated child molestation and sentenced to 10 years in prison. He's not on this registry because in 2007 the Georgia Supreme Court ruled that sex between teens is not the same as adults who prey on children.

And despite the fact that some sex offenders feel wronged. The registry does keep track of people classified as violent predators. "Better to have it than not have it. And it does serve the right purpose when done the right way," says Investigator Sylvester.

News 12 talked with Wendy Whitaker's attorney with the Southern Center for Human Rights. She said they are continuing to work with Wendy to keep her in her home. They have not filed an appeal to last week's federal ruling that she must move because of those residency restrictions. But she will remain on the sex offender registry for the rest of her life.

The main difference in the Wilson case that was overturned, and the Whitaker case is how they were charged. Whitaker plead guilty to sodomy and served five years probation. Wilson was charged with aggravated child molestation and he was sentenced to 10 years in prison, a harsher punishment, but only served three because his case was overturned.

More Stories
Celebrating the Fourth

Traffic moving again on Gordon Hwy. after accident

Search crews ask for help in the search for an elderly Augusta woman

Former NFL QB Steve McNair killed

Teenage girl 5th victim of apparent South Carolina serial killer

UPDATE: Victim identified in shooting at apartment complex

Updated: Search crews continue to look for missing Augusta woman

Big Business For Barbecue This Weekend

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
By posting this comment I have read and agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy:
You must agree to the Terms of Service to continue.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: Andrew Location: Lawenceville on Dec 6, 2008 at 01:54 PM
I would like to know if there is any way for me to get of the registry list? Because I have papers from my lawyer stating that don't have to registry based on plead. I was 19 and she was 15. I was just released form prison Oct.5,2008.

Posted by: Anonymous on Nov 20, 2008 at 06:50 AM
If a person was found guilty for something they have done 15-30 years ago and for some reason due to a change in the law or new DNA evidence they are found innocence and they are released, why not do the same for the sex offender. If the law has changed for the people today, then the people with similar crimes in the past should not be found guilty today. I personally do not think teenagers (even adults) should be sluts and sleep with any one and every one, but there is a BIG difference in two teenagers sleeping or doing things together AND when an adult has sex with a child. To fix this problem with the teenagers sleeping together is unfixable due to the many single parents who has got to get there need (sex)fulfilled ending up with many failed, unstable relationships, and to the parents who do not teach their children self respect for lack of time or lack of respect for them self. Teenager sees this and says, what not do what everyone else is doing, no one seems to care about me and how I live. If the parents were charged for stuff relating to these teenagers charges years ago and even charge them today for what their teenager do, then we would see a lot of crime, sex related diseases, pregnancy, etc. go down. Anyhow with both parents working to feed these kids and the kids of parents and the parents themselves who are too sorry to get off their butts and work, there is no time to properly raise kids today. But I hope you got out of this was “If the law has changed for the people today, then the people with similar crimes in the past should not be found guilty today”.

Posted by: SexOffenderIssues Location: GA on Nov 19, 2008 at 11:56 AM
http://sexoffenderissues.blogspot.com These laws are insane, draconian, unconstitution, cruel & unusual, all created by a corrupt government who cares nothing about morals and values. Why don't we back date the laws 100 years, and see who was married when they were young, then throw them all in prison? I bet many peoples mothers, fathers would be sex offenders today. See here for MANY more children ruined do to these draconian laws, some as young as 4 years old, for HUGGING THEIR TEACHER!!!! http://sexoffenderissues.blogspot.com/2007/12/child-sex-offenders.html

Posted by: Cathy Location: Warrenville on Nov 19, 2008 at 11:03 AM
I think that if a fifteen year old agrees to have sex with a 17 year old then the 17 year old should not be charged. It takes two and if you agree to have sex then you should not charge the other person with a crime. That is so wrong! These fast behind children need to sit down and stop blaming other people for the choices they make in life.

Top Video
Online Poll
Should Gov. Mark Sanford resign?

Yes
No


Maxing Your Money Blog
Sponsored Headlines